Networking logos are quite difficult to design; it is because the word “networking” is not an easy word to characterize in an image and it proves to be an obscure one if ever to come up with an image related to it. When we are talking about networking logos, it is a difficult job to create one because depicting networking just through one image is an abstruse task. Below are some essential ingredients of a good logo:
Colors – Logo as a visual tool contains colors and colors are important elements in communicating and enticing people to a certain degree. You will find that the color blue is prevalent in many logos and networking. This is because blue represents communication and connection in a friendly spirit. Different shades of blue can also be use to give variations and further harmonize the “cool” atmosphere of communication.
Designing – Designing is also one of the major factor in a logo. The design visually suggests the motive of the company it represents. For example, a logo with an image of an angel holding two people in both of his hands. This implies that the company that owns the logo is upholding the communication in a person to person basis. The logo should serve like this; it should represent the ideals and the motive of the business. People who see the logo were being handed down information visually, a form of communication that is subliminally potent and lasts a long time.
Style – The lack of and the excessive use of style is crucial to the success of a logo. It has been observed many times over that the main reason why a logo does not work effectively because of the unnecessary style in it. The logo’s style should fit perfectly the motive of the company; otherwise the images within it will be misconstrued for something else and might lead off target a potential customer.
For example, a too classy-looking logo in excessive style may be turned down by customers looking for an economical business deal—when in fact the company behind the logo offers exactly what they are looking for, had it not been for the wrong impression of the “classy-expensive” logo style.